Nobody agrees on the number
Without an independent view of value, both sides anchor on what they need rather than what the business is worth. I build the financial analysis that gives the conversation a defensible starting point.
Shareholder buyout financing
Shareholder transitions happen for many reasons: retirement, a management buyout, a family transition, an unexpected life event or a partnership that no longer works. Some are planned and collaborative. Others arrive with short timelines and competing interests.
In either case, the exit has to be funded without leaving the business short of working capital. That is the problem I solve.
The situations I see
The earlier value, structure and financing are considered together, the more room there is to reach a workable outcome.
One partner is retiring on a known timeline. There’s time to structure it properly and finance it well.
Two shareholders no longer agree on direction. Someone has to buy someone out, and neither will move first because neither knows what’s fair or what’s fundable.
Death, disability, divorce, or a shareholders’ agreement trigger. Timelines are short and emotions are high.
The people running the business want to own it, and the founder is willing, but management has limited capital and the founder needs to be paid.
The next generation is taking over. The transition has to provide a fair outcome for the current owners while leaving the business with enough cash and borrowing capacity to operate.
Why these deals stall
Even when the parties are willing, three issues commonly stall the transaction.
Without an independent view of value, both sides anchor on what they need rather than what the business is worth. I build the financial analysis that gives the conversation a defensible starting point.
A price gets agreed, then the financing falls apart because nobody checked whether a lender would advance against it. Buyouts are harder to finance than acquisitions because the company takes on debt and gets no new assets or earnings in return.
The deal closes, debt service starts, and there’s no working capital left to run the business. A buyout that wins the negotiation and breaks the company isn’t a good outcome.
How buyouts are funded and structured
A workable structure typically combines several layers. My job is finding the combination that pays the departing shareholder fairly and leaves the business able to operate.
Against the company’s cash flow and assets. It is usually the least expensive layer and the most constrained.
The departing shareholder finances part of their own exit, usually subordinated to the bank. This is often the piece that makes the whole deal work.
Whether the company buys the shares or the remaining shareholders do has significant tax consequences. Get your accountant and lawyer in early; I’ll work alongside them.
More expensive than senior bank debt, but often able to offer greater flexibility around amortization, covenants and transaction structure.
A way to bridge a valuation gap when the two sides genuinely disagree about the outlook.
Capital contributed by the remaining shareholders or management team, reducing the amount the business has to borrow.
What I do
I can work with the company and its shareholders collaboratively when the transaction is agreed and the interests are aligned. Where price, terms or outcomes are contested, I act for one party only and work alongside each party’s legal and tax advisers.
Relevant engagement
A debt-to-equity conversion, a new senior lender and an ownership transition gave an energy-services contractor room to recover.
Read the engagement →Frequently asked questions
It’s the ideal time. Knowing what’s financeable before you negotiate keeps you from agreeing to a number the deal can’t support.
Often, but the appropriate borrower and transaction structure depend on the company’s cash flow, the purchase structure and legal and tax considerations. I model whether the business can support the debt and work alongside legal and tax advisers on the final structure.
Where price and structure are broadly agreed, generally three to six months from engagement to close. Where they are not, the negotiation drives the timeline far more than the financing does. I have seen those run a year or longer, usually because nobody brought in an independent view early enough.
More common than you’d think. An independent, credible analysis of value and structure often unlocks a conversation that’s been stuck for months, because it moves the discussion off personalities and onto numbers. It doesn’t always work. If it doesn’t, you’re into your shareholders’ agreement and your lawyer.
I build the financial analysis and a defensible view of value for negotiation and financing purposes. If you need a formal valuation report for tax, litigation, or matrimonial purposes, that requires a Chartered Business Valuator, and I’ll refer you to one.
Engagements are either a mandate or a scoped project. A mandate is a work fee through the process plus a fee payable on closing, priced to the size and complexity of the deal. A scoped project is a fixed fee, priced to what's being built. You get a written proposal before you commit to anything, and the first conversation is free.
Start a confidential conversation
If you’re heading into a shareholder transition, or stuck in one, it’s worth a call.